Nearly every first-time fund manager who walks through our door asks the same question: "Do we actually need full FCA authorisation?" Usually, no. The UK has a registration regime called RVECA that was designed for venture capital managers, and for a first or second fund it is almost always the better fit. We use it for the majority of our UK fund launches. It is faster, it costs less, and the ongoing regulatory burden is manageable for a small team.
The problem is that almost nobody understands it properly. People have heard of sub-threshold AIFM registration. RVECA is different. It has its own eligibility rules, its own reporting requirements, and some real limitations worth knowing about before you commit.
What RVECA actually is
RVECA stands for Registered Venture Capital Adviser. The regime started life as the European Venture Capital Funds Regulation (EuVECA), Regulation (EU) No 345/2013 [1]. After Brexit, the Venture Capital Funds (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 carried it into UK domestic law and renamed it [2]. The parent legislation is the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations 2013 [3], which also created the broader Small Registered Regime that RVECA belongs to.
The practical effect: you register with the FCA instead of getting authorised. That distinction matters. Registration means fewer ongoing obligations, lower capital requirements, and an application that takes months rather than the better part of a year. The FCA Handbook defines it under Article 14a of the assimilated EuVECA Regulation [4].
Who qualifies
RVECA is not for everyone. Three conditions matter most.
AUM thresholds. Total assets under management must stay below EUR 500 million (unleveraged, five-year lock-up) or EUR 100 million otherwise [5]. For a first fund, this is rarely an issue.
The 70% rule. This is the one that catches people out. At least 70% of your fund's aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital must go into qualifying investments [1]. The remaining 30% is flexible. Qualifying investments are equity or quasi-equity in eligible portfolio companies, loans to those companies (capped at 30% of commitments), and units in other qualifying VC funds (capped at 10%).
What counts as a qualifying company. At the time of your first investment, the target must be unlisted, with fewer than 250 employees, turnover below EUR 50 million, and a balance sheet below EUR 43 million [1]. SMEs on a recognised growth market with up to 499 employees also qualify. The company cannot be a fund, bank, investment firm, or insurer, and it must be domiciled in a FATF-cooperative jurisdiction.
No fund-level leverage. You can borrow against uncalled capital, but not beyond it. If your LPs have committed EUR 10 million and you have called EUR 6 million, you can borrow up to EUR 4 million [1]. That is the ceiling.
What it costs versus full authorisation
Here is where it gets concrete.
RVECA requires EUR 50,000 in initial capital, plus own funds of at least one-eighth of the prior year's fixed overheads [1]. Full-scope AIFM authorisation requires EUR 125,000 (external manager) or EUR 300,000 (internally managed), plus one-quarter of overheads [6]. The FCA application fee for RVECA is GBP 1,000 [5]. Annual periodic fees are around GBP 718-781 [7]. Both figures are a fraction of what authorised firms pay.
But the real difference is compliance overhead. RVECA managers are exempt from SM&CR, the full AIFMD remuneration code, and the mandatory depositary requirement [8]. You file Article 12 annual reports instead of the quarterly or semi-annual Annex IV returns that authorised AIFMs deal with. In practice, that means you do not need a dedicated compliance officer from day one. For a two-person GP team, that is the difference between viable and not.
Timeline matters too. Registration takes roughly three months from a complete submission [5]. Full authorisation is six to twelve months. If you are trying to close your fund by a specific date, those extra months are not abstract.
What you actually report
Lighter does not mean zero. You still have obligations.
Article 12 requires an annual report to the FCA within six months of your fund's year-end: portfolio composition, audited accounts, profit disclosure, and a summary of the year's activities [1]. Article 13 requires that before any investor commits capital, you disclose the manager's identity, investment strategy, risk profile, costs, valuation methodology, and how you manage conflicts of interest [1].
What you skip is Annex IV reporting [9]. That is the detailed quarterly or semi-annual regime covering leverage, counterparty exposures, liquidity profiles, and risk metrics. For authorised managers, Annex IV is one of the heaviest recurring obligations. Not having to do it saves real time and money.
Who you can take money from
RVECA restricts your investor base. Article 6 of the assimilated EuVECA Regulation limits you to three categories [1]:
- Professional clients under MiFID II (institutions, large corporates, regulated entities).
- Non-professional investors who commit at least EUR 100,000 and sign a separate written risk acknowledgment.
- Senior management or employees of the RVECA manager.
RVECA funds are classified as non-mainstream pooled investments under UK financial promotion rules, so your marketing materials need to comply with those restrictions. In practice, this is where most emerging VC managers are fundraising anyway, so the constraint is rarely binding.
The post-Brexit marketing gap
Before Brexit, EuVECA gave you a passport to market across the EU through a simplified notification. That passport is gone [10].
If you want EU-based LPs, you now have to go through each member state's national private placement regime individually. It is doable, but it adds cost and legal complexity. The BVCA made this point forcefully in its June 2025 response to the FCA, arguing that without reforms the regime has limited commercial appeal for managers targeting European capital [10].
If your investors are primarily UK-based or non-EU international, this matters less. But if you are counting on continental European institutions for a meaningful share of your fundraise, plan for the additional friction.
How RVECA compares to continental regimes
Most EU countries have their own light-touch registration under Article 3(2) of AIFMD, usually called sub-threshold AIFM. There are real differences.
The continental regimes impose no strategy restriction. You can run venture, buyout, credit, real estate, whatever you like, as long as you stay under the AUM thresholds. RVECA's 70% qualifying VC requirement locks you into venture capital [11]. On the other hand, RVECA gives you a recognised regulatory label that continental sub-threshold registration does not.
Country-specific notes: Germany's BaFin registration takes about a month, the GmbH & Co. KG structure is well-established, and ongoing obligations are minimal [12]. Luxembourg's popular RAIF vehicle cannot be managed by a sub-threshold AIFM, so you need full authorisation there [13]. Ireland limits sub-threshold appointments to regulated funds to two years [14].
The biggest difference remains cross-border access. EU sub-threshold managers can market within the bloc. UK RVECA managers cannot.
What is changing
The regime is under active review. In April 2025, HM Treasury published a consultation proposing to remove the fixed AUM thresholds from statute and let the FCA set proportionate rules instead [8]. RVECA was explicitly carved out, with the government saying it would consult on VC-specific changes separately.
The FCA's own Call for Input proposed a three-tier approach: large AIFMs (GBP 5 billion-plus), mid-tier (GBP 100 million to GBP 5 billion), and small (under GBP 100 million) [15]. They also floated the idea of a dedicated regime for venture and growth capital funds. That would be significant if it materialises.
The BVCA pushed for concrete changes in its response: drop the 70% threshold to 60%, broaden eligible investments to include more debt instruments and seed structures, and align marketing restrictions with UK financial promotion reforms [10]. I think these are reasonable proposals. The 70% rule in particular feels outdated given that the EU recently reduced the ELTIF qualifying threshold to 55%.
The European Commission launched its own consultation on VC fund reform in January 2026, with a review of EuVECA planned for Q3 2026 [16]. Both sides of the Channel are moving toward lighter regulation for VC managers.
The UK market
UK VC is not short of momentum. BVCA data puts VC investment at GBP 9 billion in 2024, up 12.5% year-on-year [17]. Capital raised by UK VC funds nearly doubled, from GBP 2.3 billion in 2023 to GBP 4 billion in 2024, across 48 actively raising funds [18]. Seed-stage investment jumped over 80%. VC-backed companies support more than 378,000 jobs [17].
There is demand for new managers. I think the regulatory framework should be helping them get started, not getting in the way. RVECA, rough edges and all, mostly delivers on that.
Practical considerations
If you are thinking about RVECA, here is what the process actually involves:
- Application. You apply through the FCA's Connect portal. Expect to submit a three-year financial forecast (monthly for Year 1), a liquidity management plan, Consumer Duty documentation, and ESG policies [5]. Advisory fees for the application run from about GBP 10,000 plus VAT.
- Fund structure. Most UK VC funds use English limited partnerships (Limited Partnerships Act 1907) or Scottish LPs. Your LPA and PPM need to reflect the 70% qualifying investment requirement.
- Portfolio monitoring. The 70% threshold is ongoing, not a one-off check at first close. You need portfolio tracking infrastructure from the start.
- Threshold risk. If your AUM crosses EUR 500 million (unleveraged) or EUR 100 million (leveraged), you must notify the FCA and potentially seek full authorisation [3].
- Valuation. Article 11 requires transparent valuation procedures and at least an annual valuation [1]. Specify the methodology in your fund documents upfront.
How we use RVECA at Infra One
We run UK venture capital funds under RVECA for our first-time and second-time manager clients. For most emerging VC managers launching in the UK, it is the right framework: the setup is fast, the regulatory demands are proportionate, and institutional LPs recognise the designation.
Our fund administration platform handles formation, investor onboarding with automated KYC/AML, capital calls, annual reporting, and the ongoing portfolio monitoring that the 70% threshold requires. We built it to work for managers on lighter regulatory regimes, so the compliance work does not land on a GP team that has better things to do.
If you are planning a UK venture fund and want to talk through whether RVECA fits, book a call.
DISCLOSURE: This communication is on behalf of Infra One GmbH ("Infra One"). This communication is for informational purposes only, and contains general information only. Infra One is not, by means of this communication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business or interests. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business or interests, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. This communication is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Infra One does not assume any liability for reliance on the information provided herein. © 2026 Infra One GmbH All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.