Poland does not show up on most lists of European fund jurisdictions, but it should. The regulatory framework is straightforward, setup costs are a fraction of what you pay in Luxembourg or Ireland, and the domestic VC ecosystem has grown significantly over the past decade — driven in part by PFR Ventures co-investment programmes that have channelled serious capital into emerging managers [1]. I trained as a lawyer in Kraków before working across EU and US fund regulation, so I have seen both sides of this: the Polish system from the inside and how it compares to the jurisdictions our clients typically consider.
For emerging managers looking to launch a first fund focused on Central European deal flow, Poland is worth a serious look. The thing you need to understand is the ASI structure and the two-tier registration system that the KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego, Poland's financial regulator) operates.
The ASI and ZASI: how Polish fund structures work
The Alternative Investment Company (ASI — Alternatywna Spółka Inwestycyjna) was introduced in 2016 under amendments to Poland's Investment Funds Act and has become the standard vehicle for VC and PE funds in the country [2]. An ASI is not a separate legal entity type — it is a designation applied to a company structure that can take several legal forms: limited partnership (spółka komandytowa), limited joint-stock partnership (spółka komandytowo-akcyjna), limited liability company, or joint-stock company [3].
The vast majority of Polish VC funds use the limited partnership form. It gives you tax transparency, familiar LP/GP economics, and a clean separation between investor capital and management [1].
The ASI must be managed by a ZASI (Zarządzający Alternatywną Spółką Inwestycyjną) — the ASI Manager. This is the entity that registers with or obtains a licence from the KNF [2]. The ZASI can manage the ASI internally (the ASI and manager are the same entity) or externally (a separate management company acts as general partner and ZASI). External management is the norm for VC funds because it creates clearer separation of responsibilities and lets you manage multiple funds from a single manager entity [2].
The threshold numbers
Poland follows the standard AIFMD sub-threshold exemption. A ZASI can register with the KNF rather than seeking a full licence if total assets under management stay below [2] [3]:
- EUR 100 million for funds using leverage.
- EUR 500 million for funds without leverage and with a five-year lock-up on investor redemptions.
Most Polish VC and PE managers operate well below these thresholds. First funds typically target EUR 10–50 million in committed capital, so the registration path is the relevant one for nearly every emerging manager [1].
What registration looks like
KNF registration for a sub-threshold ZASI is simpler than full licensing, but it is not a rubber stamp. You need to submit [4]:
- The ZASI's articles of association (executed by notarial deed — you cannot use Poland's standard online company registration system for this [4]).
- A description of each ASI the ZASI intends to manage, including fund names, structure, and investment strategy.
- The registered address of the ZASI.
- Documentation satisfying the requirements of EU Delegated Regulation 231/2013 (the AIFMD implementing regulation) [4].
The KNF conducts a formal completeness review followed by a substantive examination. For straightforward applications, registration takes four to six weeks. Complex structures or novel governance arrangements can take two to three months [4] [5]. The KNF does not charge a registration fee for sub-threshold ZASI managers [6].
Full licensing for managers above the thresholds is a different proposition entirely. The KNF requires comprehensive governance documentation, risk management frameworks, depositary arrangements, and detailed operational procedures. Licensing typically takes six months minimum, and complex applications can stretch to a year [5].
Capital requirements and costs
Here is the number that surprises people: there is no explicit minimum capital requirement for registered (sub-threshold) ZASI managers [2]. This is a meaningful difference from jurisdictions like France or Luxembourg, where the management company must hold at least EUR 125,000 in share capital before it can operate.
The overall cost of setting up a fund management operation in Poland is correspondingly low. A typical first-year budget for a registration-based structure looks like this:
- Legal and professional services: EUR 2,500–4,500 for entity formation, documentation, and regulatory navigation. Complex structures can run to EUR 7,500 [7].
- Notarial and court registration fees: EUR 300–500 for the ZASI, plus similar for the ASI [7].
- Registered office: EUR 200–400 per year for a virtual office in Warsaw [7].
- KNF registration fee: Zero for sub-threshold managers [6].
All in, you are looking at EUR 5,000–10,000 for a straightforward registration-based setup [7] [4]. That is a fraction of what the same exercise costs in Luxembourg, Dublin, or London.
Investor classification
Poland follows the MiFID professional client classification. ASIs marketed exclusively to professional investors benefit from a substantially lighter regulatory regime — no diversification limits, no mandatory depositary, and no detailed prospectus requirements [3] [8].
The minimum investment for professional investors in a Polish ASI is the PLN equivalent of EUR 60,000 [3]. This is lower than the EUR 100,000 threshold in France or the EUR 200,000 semi-professional category in Germany, which makes it easier for smaller institutional investors, family offices, and qualified individuals to participate.
In practice, most Polish VC funds restrict their investor base to professional clients to stay within the lighter regulatory framework. Accepting retail investors triggers extensive statutory requirements including investment restrictions, leverage limitations, mandatory depositary arrangements, and detailed offering documents [3] [8]. No emerging manager wants that overhead on a first fund.
PFR Ventures and government co-investment
One feature that makes Poland particularly attractive for emerging managers is the PFR Ventures programme. PFR (Polski Fundusz Rozwoju) runs several co-investment initiatives that provide capital to VC funds alongside private LPs [9]. The PFR Starter programme, for example, contributes up to PLN 65 million (roughly EUR 15 million) per fund, covering up to 80% of total fund capitalisation [9].
These programmes require the fund to be structured as an ASI with a registered ZASI manager. For first-time managers without established track records, PFR co-investment can be the difference between a viable fund and a fundraise that stalls. It also validates the manager with other LPs — having a government co-investor in the cap table signals institutional credibility.
How Poland compares to other EU jurisdictions
A few differences stand out:
- Cost. Poland is the cheapest major EU jurisdiction for fund setup. EUR 5,000–10,000 all-in versus EUR 15,000–30,000 in Luxembourg or EUR 12,000+ in France [7].
- Speed. KNF registration takes four to six weeks for straightforward applications. Comparable to BaFin in Germany, faster than full AMF authorisation in France [4].
- No minimum capital for registered managers. Most EU jurisdictions require EUR 125,000+ for the management company. Poland does not impose this on sub-threshold ZASI managers [2].
- Lower investor minimum. EUR 60,000 professional investor threshold versus EUR 100,000 in France or EUR 200,000 semi-professional in Germany [3].
- Cross-border limitations. Like all sub-threshold managers, registered ZASI managers do not get the AIFMD marketing passport. Marketing to investors in other EU countries requires national private placement compliance [8].
- Government co-investment. PFR Ventures programmes are unusually generous by European standards and specifically require ASI structures [9].
What to watch out for
Poland's light-touch registration regime has real advantages, but a few things catch managers off guard:
- Notarial deed requirement. You cannot form a ZASI through Poland's standard online company registration (S24). The Investment Funds Act requires notarial documentation for the constitutional documents [4]. This adds time and cost compared to a standard Polish company formation.
- KNF governance expectations. Even for sub-threshold managers, the KNF expects substantive governance documentation: how investment decisions are made, how conflicts of interest are managed, how operational continuity is ensured [4] [5]. Minimalist compliance approaches slow the process down.
- Sequential registration. The ZASI must be registered with the KNF before the ASI can be registered in the National Court Register (KRS). The KRS registration itself takes seven to fourteen business days [10]. This sequential process means your total timeline from entity formation to operational fund is three to four months, not four to six weeks.
- Threshold monitoring. If your AUM crosses the registration thresholds, you need to apply for a full KNF licence. Plan for this from the start if you expect to scale significantly.
How we help at Infra One
We set up and administer funds across Europe, and Poland is a jurisdiction where our legal team has deep expertise — I trained in Kraków and have worked on Polish fund structures throughout my career. We handle the ZASI formation, KNF registration process, ASI structuring, investor onboarding with automated KYC/AML, and ongoing fund administration.
For managers planning to launch in Poland and later expand across the EU, we prepare the groundwork for transitioning from sub-threshold registration to full licensing or appointing a third-party AIFM. Our fund platform is designed for this trajectory.
If you are considering Poland for your fund launch, get in touch.
DISCLOSURE: This communication is on behalf of Infra One GmbH ("Infra One"). This communication is for informational purposes only, and contains general information only. Infra One is not, by means of this communication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business or interests. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business or interests, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. This communication is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Infra One does not assume any liability for reliance on the information provided herein. © 2026 Infra One GmbH All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.