Every first-time fund manager I speak to in India wants to talk about fundraising, deal pipeline, or carry structures. I always steer the conversation back to one question: which AIF category are you registering under? It sounds procedural. It is not. The category you select under SEBI's Alternative Investment Fund Regulations, 2012 [1] determines what you can invest in, how your fund is taxed, the minimum ticket size your investors need to write, and the compliance burden you carry for the life of the fund. And once you register, you cannot switch categories without re-registering from scratch.
I have seen managers pick the wrong category because someone told them "Category II is the most flexible" without explaining what that flexibility costs in tax efficiency. Others default to Category I because they heard it gets government support, only to discover the 75% unlisted equity requirement does not fit their strategy. What follows is what actually matters when making this decision.
The three categories at a glance
SEBI divides AIFs into three categories under the 2012 Regulations [1][2]. Each has a distinct investment mandate, tax treatment, and regulatory perimeter.
Category I covers funds with a positive spillover for the economy: venture capital funds, SME funds, infrastructure funds, and social venture funds. The government actively encourages these vehicles through concessions. At least 75% of investible funds must go into unlisted equity or equity-linked instruments of the target sector [1][2]. You get pass-through taxation on most income, which means the fund itself is not taxed, and income flows through to investors and is taxed in their hands based on the nature of the income [3]. The trade-off is strict investment restrictions. If your strategy involves meaningful positions in listed securities or debt, Category I will not work.
Category II is the catch-all. Private equity funds, debt funds, fund-of-funds, and anything that does not fit Category I or III lands here. There are no specific investment restrictions beyond what SEBI generally prohibits (no leverage except for meeting temporary funding requirements up to 30 days) [1]. Tax treatment is also pass-through for income other than business profits [3]. The flexibility is real, but Category II funds do not receive the policy incentives that Category I funds sometimes get, and the broader mandate means SEBI expects more detailed disclosure in your Private Placement Memorandum about how you plan to deploy capital.
Category III funds can take on leverage and invest in listed and unlisted securities with dynamic trading strategies. Think hedge funds, PIPE strategies, and long-short equity. This is where the tax picture shifts. Category III funds face fund-level taxation on certain income streams, which means the fund pays tax before distributions reach investors [3][4]. For a venture-focused emerging manager, Category III is almost never the right choice. But if your strategy involves active trading in listed markets alongside private positions, it may be unavoidable.
Why the category decision is irreversible in practice
SEBI registration is category-specific. Your application, your PPM, your investment mandate, your compliance framework: all of it is built around the category you select [1][5]. If you register as a Category I Venture Capital Fund and later decide you want to do growth equity deals in listed companies, you cannot simply amend your registration. You would need to wind down or restructure, and register a new fund under the appropriate category. I have seen this happen once. It took over a year and cost the manager significant credibility with their LPs.
The practical advice: do not pick your category based on what sounds good. Pick it based on a specific, honest assessment of what your first fund will actually invest in. If 80% of your deals will be pre-Series A unlisted startups, Category I VCF is the obvious fit. If you want to mix in secondary purchases, structured debt, or later-stage listed positions, Category II gives you room. Only go Category III if leverage and listed market exposure are core to your thesis.
Tax treatment: where the differences hit hardest
This is where I spend the most time with first-time managers, because investors care deeply about tax efficiency and will ask pointed questions during fundraising.
Category I and II AIFs benefit from pass-through status on income other than business profits under Section 115UB of the Income Tax Act [3]. In practice, this means long-term capital gains on unlisted securities held for more than 24 months are taxed at 12.5% in the hands of the investor (for most investor types) following recent amendments [3]. Short-term capital gains face higher rates depending on the investor's tax bracket. The fund itself does not pay tax on these gains; it passes them through.
Business income, however, is taxed at the fund level even for Category I and II AIFs. This matters if your fund earns consulting fees, management fees at the fund level, or income that SEBI or the tax authorities classify as business income rather than investment income [3].
Category III AIFs do not get pass-through treatment on capital gains. The fund pays tax, and distributions to investors are then exempt to avoid double taxation [3][4]. The upshot: investors in Category III funds tend to receive lower after-tax returns than if the same investment had been held through a Category I or II structure, because the fund-level tax rate may exceed what certain investors (especially non-residents or tax-exempt entities) would have paid on their own.
For emerging managers raising from a mix of domestic HNIs, family offices, and potentially foreign investors, the pass-through treatment of Category I and II is usually a strong selling point. Make sure you can articulate exactly how this works to your prospective LPs.
Minimum corpus and investor thresholds
SEBI mandates minimum fund sizes and investor commitments that vary by category [1][5]. The minimum corpus for any AIF is INR 20 crore (INR 5 crore for angel funds under Category I). The minimum investment from any single investor is INR 1 crore, though this drops to INR 25 lakhs for accredited investors [5][6]. The manager and sponsor must commit at least 2.5% of the corpus or INR 5 crore, whichever is lower (for Category I), and similar but varying percentages for other categories [1].
These thresholds shape your fundraising approach. If you are targeting first-time angel investors who want to write INR 50 lakh checks, you need to confirm they qualify as accredited investors under SEBI's framework, or your minimum ticket is INR 1 crore. I have seen fundraises stall because the manager assumed every HNI could write a INR 1 crore check into an illiquid vehicle. Not everyone can or will.
Sub-categories within Category I: picking the right slot
Category I is not monolithic. It has four sub-categories: Venture Capital Funds, SME Funds, Social Venture Funds, and Infrastructure Funds [1][2]. Each has specific investment criteria.
Venture Capital Funds must invest at least 75% of investible funds in unlisted equity or equity-linked instruments of venture capital undertakings, broadly defined as Indian companies that are not listed on a recognised stock exchange at the time of investment [1]. This is the most common sub-category for emerging tech-focused managers.
SME Funds target small and medium enterprises as defined under the MSMED Act. Social Venture Funds invest in social enterprises with measurable social impact. Infrastructure Funds target infrastructure projects or companies. SEBI's consultation papers and circulars from 2024-2025 have added further clarifications for each sub-category [7].
If you are launching a typical early-stage tech VC fund, the Venture Capital Fund sub-category under Category I is almost certainly where you belong. But read the fine print on what qualifies as a "venture capital undertaking," since there are conditions around the company's age, stage, and sector that can trip you up.
Leverage rules and fund tenure: two more category-dependent constraints
Leverage is the sharpest dividing line between categories. Category I and Category II AIFs cannot borrow except to meet temporary shortfalls, typically limited to 30 days and subject to a cap relative to uncommitted capital [1][5]. No leverage means no credit facilities against the portfolio, no margin trading, and no leveraged returns. For a venture fund, this is rarely a constraint because the strategy does not require leverage. But if you were considering a credit strategy or mezzanine fund, the no-leverage restriction in Category II may limit your deployment options.
Category III AIFs can take on leverage, which is why they attract hedge fund and trading-oriented strategies [1][2]. But leverage comes with additional regulatory requirements: SEBI imposes specific leverage limits, reporting obligations around leverage ratios, and enhanced risk disclosure requirements in the PPM. If your strategy does not need leverage, do not choose Category III just because it offers the option; you are paying for it in tax treatment and compliance overhead.
Fund tenure also varies. Category I and II AIFs must have a minimum tenure of three years [1]. Most venture and PE funds set tenures of 8-10 years plus extensions. Category III funds have more flexible tenure provisions, which suits their shorter-horizon trading strategies. For an emerging VC manager, the minimum tenure is rarely binding, but you should think carefully about the extension provisions in your fund documents, because venture portfolios often take longer than expected to return capital.
Sponsor commitment: your skin in the game
SEBI requires the sponsor and manager of the AIF to have continuing interest in the fund [1][5]. For Category I AIFs, the sponsor or manager must contribute at least 2.5% of the corpus or INR 5 crore, whichever is lower. For Category II, it is 2.5% or INR 5 crore. For Category III, the threshold is higher: 5% or INR 10 crore, whichever is lower.
This commitment must come from the manager's own resources, not from borrowed funds. For a first-time manager launching a INR 50 crore Category I fund, that is a INR 1.25 crore personal commitment. It is not negligible. Some managers structure their GP commitment to include commitments from partners or affiliates of the management entity, which SEBI generally permits as long as it is properly disclosed. Plan for this capital need early; it affects your personal finances and your fund economics.
Recent regulatory changes to watch
SEBI has been actively updating the AIF framework. The Master Circular for Alternative Investment Funds, updated in May 2024, consolidated operational guidance across all categories [5]. A September 2025 consultation paper addressed Category I sub-categorization and reporting requirements [7]. And the new Compliance Test Report requirements effective February 2026 add another layer of ongoing reporting that varies by category [8].
The December 2024 circular on pro-rata rights and fair investor treatment [4] also has category-wide implications: it requires all AIFs, regardless of category, to provide equal treatment to similarly-situated investors on undrawn commitments. This affects how you structure capital calls, side letters, and distribution waterfalls across all three categories.
The regulatory direction is clear: more transparency, more detailed reporting. Compliance costs are going up regardless of category. Factor that into your budget from day one.
How we help at Allocator One Bharat and Infra One
At Allocator One Bharat, we work with emerging managers in India from the very start of the fund formation process. Category selection is the first major decision we work through together, because everything downstream (your PPM, your compliance framework, your investor documentation, your tax reporting) flows from it.
We have set up funds across Category I and Category II, and we know where the practical friction points are for each. Our fund administration platform handles the ongoing compliance, reporting, and investor management that SEBI requires, so the operational weight does not fall entirely on a two-person GP team. If you are working through this decision and want a direct conversation about what fits your strategy, reach out to us.
DISCLOSURE: This communication is on behalf of Infra One GmbH ("Infra One"). This communication is for informational purposes only, and contains general information only. Infra One is not, by means of this communication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business or interests. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business or interests, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. This communication is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Infra One does not assume any liability for reliance on the information provided herein. © 2026 Infra One GmbH All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.