Carried interest is the part of GP compensation that gets the most attention and the most things wrong. I work with emerging fund managers in Germany every week, and the number who come to me with a carry structure that does not actually qualify for the preferential tax regime is higher than you would think. The difference matters. Get it right and you pay an effective rate of about 28.5% on carry. Get it wrong and you are looking at 47.5%, which is ordinary income tax plus solidarity surcharge [1].
The German rules are specific. They reward a particular type of fund structure and a particular type of carry arrangement. If you understand what the tax code is looking for, structuring becomes straightforward. If you do not, you end up retrofitting — and that is expensive.
The qualified carried interest regime
Since 2004, Germany has applied a partial exemption to carried interest paid by asset-managing (vermögensverwaltender) funds. Under this regime, 60% of carry is taxable as self-employment income at the individual manager's marginal rate. The remaining 40% is exempt [1]. For someone in the top bracket, that works out to an effective tax rate of roughly 28.5% on the full carry amount [3].
This is not a capital gains rate. It is a legislative compromise that treats carry as something between pure investment income and pure service compensation. The 40% exemption was introduced to keep Germany competitive as a fund domicile, and it has held steady for over twenty years [1].
But the exemption has conditions. Miss any of them and the entire carry payment is taxable as ordinary income.
The conditions you cannot skip
For carry to qualify for the 40% exemption, three things must be true:
- The fund must be non-trading (vermögensverwaltend). This means the fund's activities must be classified as passive asset management, not active business operations. If the fund generates business income — through heavy operational involvement in portfolio companies, for example — the entire fund is classified as a trading partnership and the preferential carry regime does not apply [3].
- The fund must invest primarily in equity and equity-related instruments. Debt-focused or lending strategies face different treatment. For a standard VC or PE fund making equity investments, this condition is usually met [1].
- Carry must only be distributed after investors have recovered their full capital contributions. This is the one I see violated most often. If your waterfall allows carry distributions before all investor capital is returned, you risk disqualification of the entire carry amount [1] [4].
Trading vs. non-trading: the classification that decides everything
The single most consequential tax decision for a German fund is whether it is classified as trading (gewerblich) or non-trading (vermögensverwaltend). A non-trading fund qualifies for the 28.5% effective carry rate. A trading fund does not — carry is fully taxable at up to 47.5% [3].
The line between the two is not always obvious. A fund that buys minority equity stakes and waits for exits is clearly non-trading. A fund that acquires majority positions, installs management, and actively restructures portfolio companies starts to look like a business. German tax authorities have historically been aggressive about reclassifying funds they consider too active [3].
For venture capital funds, non-trading status is usually straightforward. You write cheques, sit on boards, and wait. For buyout funds with operational playbooks, the analysis is harder and worth getting formal advice on before the LPA is signed.
The 2024 Federal Fiscal Court decision
In 2024, the Bundesfinanzhof issued a decision that shifted the legal framing of carried interest in a meaningful way. The court confirmed that carry is a capital-disproportionate profit allocation agreed between independent parties in the fund's LPA — not a hidden service fee paid by investors to the GP [5]. This matters because it reinforces the view that carry is a partnership profit share, which supports both the tax treatment and the argument that carry falls outside AIFMD remuneration rules.
More interesting: the court suggested that even for trading funds, carried interest might qualify for a 40% partial exemption under general taxation principles when the carry derives from dividends or capital gains [5]. If this interpretation holds, it would narrow the gap between trading and non-trading funds significantly.
But here is the catch. The German tax administration has not adopted this position. The decision has not been published in the Bundessteuerblatt II, which is the mechanism through which court rulings become binding administrative practice [5]. So for now, structuring based on the court's broader reasoning carries audit risk. Most managers I advise still structure to clearly satisfy the qualified carry regime rather than relying on the court's more favourable interpretation.
How carry flows through the structure
In a standard German GmbH & Co. KG fund, carried interest does not go directly from the fund to individual managers. It flows through a separate carry vehicle — typically another KG or GmbH & Co. KG — that holds a limited partnership interest in the main fund [3]. The carry vehicle receives a disproportionate profit allocation based on fund performance, and that allocation flows through to the individual managers as partners in the carry vehicle.
This two-tier structure exists for practical reasons. It keeps individual carry allocations confidential from LPs. It makes it easier to add or remove team members without amending the main fund's LPA. And it provides a clean separation between the manager's capital contribution (which earns a proportional return) and the performance-based carry allocation [3] [4].
Inside the carry vehicle, most funds use a points-based system rather than fixed capital percentages. Each team member is allocated a number of points based on seniority and role. The total points determine each person's share of carry. This makes it straightforward to adjust allocations when someone joins or leaves without triggering a taxable revaluation event [4].
The waterfall mechanics
German funds overwhelmingly use European-style (whole-of-fund) waterfalls. The sequence is standard: return all investor capital first, then pay the preferred return (typically 8% per annum compounded), then the GP catch-up, then the ongoing profit split — usually 80/20 [6]. The key point for tax purposes is that carry only starts flowing after full capital recovery. This is not just market convention. It is a legal requirement for the qualified carry regime [1].
American-style (deal-by-deal) waterfalls, which allow carry to flow after individual investments exceed their hurdle, are less common in Germany. They create clawback complexity and make it harder to demonstrate compliance with the capital recovery requirement. If you use one, the documentation burden increases substantially [6].
The preferred return threshold of 8% is near-universal in German PE. VC funds typically do not use a hurdle rate, which means carry flows earlier — but still only after full capital return [7].
Management fees are not carry
This sounds obvious but the separation between management fees and carried interest needs to be airtight. Management fees are compensation for running the fund — typically 1.5% to 2% of committed capital during the investment period, stepping down to 1% to 1.5% of invested capital thereafter [6]. They are paid to the management company GmbH and are fully taxable as business income.
Carried interest is a profit allocation to the carry vehicle. Different entity, different tax treatment, different calculation methodology. If the two are blended — if fee arrangements look performance-linked, or if carry distributions happen on a schedule that resembles fee payments — tax authorities can recharacterize the entire package as ordinary income [1] [4]. Keep the mechanics, the documentation, and the accounting completely separate.
One positive development: as of December 2023, management fees for alternative investment funds are exempt from German VAT under the Future Financing Act. This eliminated a long-standing competitive disadvantage relative to Luxembourg [8].
Common mistakes I see
A few patterns come up repeatedly with first-time managers:
- Distributing carry before full capital return. Sometimes through misunderstanding, sometimes through creative waterfall drafting that tries to characterise early carry as "income advances." The tax authorities see through this [1].
- Vague waterfall language. If the LPA does not specify exactly when carry begins, how it is calculated, and what triggers the capital recovery threshold, you are setting up both LP disputes and tax audit problems [4].
- Claiming non-trading status while running an operational playbook. If your fund's marketing materials talk about "hands-on value creation" and "operational transformation," do not be surprised when the tax office questions your non-trading classification [3].
- No carry vehicle. Having carry flow directly to individual managers as named LPs in the main fund makes every team change an LPA amendment. It also makes carry allocations visible to all investors. Use a carry vehicle [3].
- Rigid carry splits. Fixed percentage allocations that cannot accommodate new hires or departures create problems by year two. Points-based systems are standard for a reason [4].
How we help at Infra One
We structure and administer German GmbH & Co. KG funds for emerging managers, and getting the carry structure right from day one is a core part of what we do. We set up the fund entity, the GP GmbH, and the carry vehicle with the right separation. We draft waterfall mechanics that satisfy the qualified carry regime. We handle the ongoing fund accounting in a way that keeps carry calculations documented and auditable.
If you are planning a first fund in Germany and want to make sure your GP compensation structure actually qualifies for the tax treatment you are counting on, talk to us before you finalise the LPA. Our fund platform is built for exactly this kind of setup.
DISCLOSURE: This communication is on behalf of Infra One GmbH ("Infra One"). This communication is for informational purposes only, and contains general information only. Infra One is not, by means of this communication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business or interests. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business or interests, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. This communication is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Infra One does not assume any liability for reliance on the information provided herein. © 2026 Infra One GmbH All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.