There is a number that should change how every emerging fund manager thinks about their back office. A Capco study of 100 hedge fund failures found that 50% collapsed due to operational risk alone — a higher failure rate than the 38% caused by poor investment performance. The conventional wisdom that performance is everything turns out to be wrong. Operations kill more funds than bad deals do.
For an emerging manager raising Fund I, the implication is stark. You can have the best deal pipeline in your market, but if your operational infrastructure cannot withstand LP scrutiny, you may never get the chance to deploy capital.
The real failure pattern
Fund operations do not fail with a single dramatic event. They fail architecturally. The typical pattern looks like this: one person owns the spreadsheet. Business logic lives in email threads. Each quarter-end is a bespoke project rather than a repeatable process. Waterfall calculations are built in Excel with hardcoded assumptions that nobody remembers setting. GP catch-up provisions — the most frequently miscalculated component of distribution waterfalls — get computed differently each time because the formula was never properly documented.
Over 30% of alternative investment firms still rely on spreadsheets for critical portfolio management functions, according to KPMG. Manual reconciliation errors are the biggest operational pain point for 28% of financial institutions. The average annual cost to organisations from poor data quality is $12.9 million. These are not problems of effort — people are working hard. They are problems of architecture. The system itself is fragile.
What LPs actually evaluate
Operational due diligence has transformed from a checkbox exercise into a formal allocation gate. An estimated 85% of LPs have rejected a manager over operational concerns alone. That number has been climbing steadily — 79% of LPs report having significantly deepened their operational scrutiny in the past year. And the scope of what they examine has expanded far beyond fund accounting. LPs now evaluate cybersecurity protocols (64% require documented proof of tested cybersecurity before committing capital), compliance infrastructure, business continuity planning, and ESG governance.
The practical consequence: the average private equity fund now responds to over 150 due diligence questionnaires annually during fundraising, each averaging 250 questions across 21 categories. Response windows have compressed from 14 days to seven. If your operational infrastructure cannot produce this volume of documentation quickly and accurately, you will fall behind managers who can.
The compliance cost trap
Here is where the economics get uncomfortable. Fund managers absorb 76–100% of compliance costs themselves rather than passing them to the fund. On average, fund management businesses spend 25% of revenue on compliance, with some firms exceeding 50%. For a $50M fund charging 2% management fees — that is $1M in revenue — compliance alone can consume $250K to $500K. Add fund accounting, investor reporting, regulatory filings, and technology infrastructure, and the operational overhead for a small fund starts to crowd out the GP's ability to focus on deals.
This is the trap: you cannot cut operational spending without risking LP trust and regulatory compliance, but you cannot scale operational spending linearly without destroying your economics. The only way out is through operational efficiency — better systems, better partners, better architecture.
The outsourcing consensus
The industry has largely settled this debate. 92% of LPs actively prefer managers who outsource fund administration to third-party specialists, according to CSC. The number is so high that self-administering GPs now need to justify their choice — the default has inverted. 99% of PE, VC, and real estate managers plan to increase outsourcing over the next three years, with 46% intending to boost it by 25–50%.
Why such strong consensus? Independent fund administration provides segregation of duties around cash controls, independent NAV verification, and a governance layer that LPs can verify directly. After cases like Abraaj Group — where $400 million in investor capital was diverted to cover operational expenses, concealed for four years before detection — LPs are unwilling to accept self-reported numbers from managers without independent oversight.
Operational alpha
The strongest emerging managers are starting to treat operational infrastructure not as overhead, but as a source of competitive advantage. The concept of "operational alpha" — the idea that infrastructure is the mechanism through which investment strategy becomes reality — is gaining traction among institutional allocators.
Concretely, this means: automated capital calls that execute in hours rather than days, freeing GP time for deal work. Real-time portfolio dashboards that LPs can access on demand, reducing the volume of ad hoc reporting requests. Digital onboarding workflows that convert a prospective LP commitment into a funded subscription in days rather than weeks. ILPA-compliant quarterly reporting that flows directly from your accounting system without manual intervention.
The ILPA updated its Reporting Template in January 2025, expanding required expense categories from 9 to 22. This is the direction of travel: more granular transparency, more standardised reporting, more data. Managers whose operational infrastructure can produce this information natively will have a structural advantage over those who assemble it manually each quarter.
Where to start
If you are reading this and recognising your own operations in the failure patterns above, the sequence matters. First, get an honest assessment of your current state: how long does your quarterly reporting actually take? How many manual reconciliation steps exist in your accounting workflow? What would happen if your key operations person left tomorrow? Second, engage a professional fund administrator before your next reporting cycle — not after it goes wrong. Third, build the operational infrastructure that will survive LP due diligence, not just the infrastructure that gets you through next quarter.
We built Backbone and our fund administration services specifically for this problem — giving emerging managers institutional-grade operations without building an internal team. If you want to talk through your fund's operational architecture, book a call with our team.
DISCLOSURE: This communication is on behalf of Infra One GmbH ("Infra One"). This communication is for informational purposes only, and contains general information only. Infra One is not, by means of this communication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business or interests. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business or interests, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. This communication is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Infra One does not assume any liability for reliance on the information provided herein. © 2026 Infra One GmbH All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.